5 Reasons Right-Wing Attacks on Electric Vehicles Are B.S.

Published April 24, 2024

Categories

Climate

Republicans are turning to misinformation to rail against electric cars, opposing science and policy that benefits workers, families, and our planet.

Republicans are turning to misinformation to rail against electric cars, opposing science and policy that benefits workers, families, and our planet.

As United States policy inches toward the changes we need to protect our health and planet, Republican politicians have found a new rhetorical punching bag: electric vehicles (EVs).

In recent years, Biden has introduced policies that support electric vehicles, including new tailpipe emissions standards and rebates for people buying EVs. These policies will help clean up our air, fight climate change, and boost American manufacturing.

But if you believed what many Republican politicians say about electric vehicles, you’d think they were part of an evil plot to force everyone to buy luxury Teslas and cause huge blackouts. 

In recent years, Republican rhetoric on EVs has grown to preposterous levels, with real policy consequences. In one of the wildest examples, lawmakers in Wyoming proposed a bill that would ban EV sales in the state by 2035.

Yet the EV market is growing and more voters on both sides of the aisle are recognizing the advantages. Several states and their autoworkers (including those in red states) are already benefiting from an EV boom, buoyed by Biden’s policies.

Republicans are increasingly turning to misleading arguments and outright lies on EVs. And this is yet another cynical tactic to appeal to dirty energy donors and drum up publicity. So we’re bringing you the truth behind five of their most incredulous claims. To start …

1. Electric Cars Are A Lot Cleaner Than Gas-Powered Cars

In 2023, Republican Senator Rick Scott claimed that there’s “ample evidence to suggest that EVs are not as clean as people are being led to believe.” He even tried to pass a bill shortened to the “DIRTY CAR EV” Act to study EVs’ climate impact.

This is incredibly disingenuous. We’ve known for years that EVs are cleaner than gas-powered vehicles, especially when it comes to air and climate pollution.

Making EVs may take more energy than gas-powered cars. But this excess is quickly made up for once the cars are driven, as EVs are much more efficient than gas-powered cars — usually in just less than two years. As our electric grid transitions to renewables, they will only get cleaner. Back in 2020, life cycle emissions for an EV with 300 miles of range were about half as much as a gas-powered vehicle.

EVs are kinder to our lungs, too. Particulate matter (PM) emissions are much lower from EVs than gas and diesel cars. One study of environmental justice communities in California found that EV adoption would reduce nitrogen dioxide and PM exposure in these communities (low-income communities and communities of color are more likely to live near major highways and suffer from related air pollution).

2. EVs Cost Less to Own and Operate and the Upfront Price Tag Keeps Falling

Republicans love to frame EVs as luxury vehicles of the coastal elite. But the truth is, electric vehicles are cheaper to maintain than gas-powered ones, and up-front costs are continuing to plummet — in part thanks to rebates passed by the Biden administration. Battery prices are also dropping.

Moreover, charging an electric vehicle is less expensive than fueling at the gas pump, and they cost less to maintain. The Department of Energy found that EVs cost around 40% less per mile than gas-powered cars over the course of their lifetimes.

3. EVs Fulfill Most of Our Needs on Range — and They Keep Improving

Scare tactics on EVs include images of people stranded on the side of the highway because their battery died. But that’s highly unlikely and will become more unlikely as batteries and charging infrastructure improve.

From 2021 to 2022, EV charging stations worldwide increased by 55%. Biden’s 2021 infrastructure bill set aside $7.5 billion to grow our country’s network of charging stations.

Nevertheless, most drivers and most trips don’t require huge ranges, especially since EVs can charge overnight at home with a standard plug and outlet. The vast majority of trips we take are short — driving to work, going to school, running errands.

Eighty-five percent of drivers travel less than 100 miles per day by car, while most EVs have a 200-plus-mile range. And manufacturers are continually improving the technology and developing new cars with longer ranges.

4. The Grid Is Ready for Electric Vehicles

Whenever we talk about electrifying anything, industry boosters and right-wingers alike proclaim that the grid isn’t ready. They wail that we’re risking blackouts on the grid and blown fuses in our homes. And they’re bringing out the same arguments when it comes to electric cars.

But multiple studies have found that our grid has the capacity to support EV charging, even given the market’s expected growth. EV charging isn’t that big of an addition to the grid — it uses less electricity than heating our water or heating our homes.

Many of these concerns will be further allayed as we continue toward 100% renewable energy. More solar energy means more energy available for EVs to charge during the day, reducing their already negligible impact on the grid.

5. Electric Vehicles Are a Huge Opportunity for Auto Workers

One of the most-used false claims against EVs is that their growth is a threat to autoworkers and American manufacturing. Former President Donald Trump claims his successor has “ordered a hit job on Michigan manufacturing” with EV incentives. But nothing could be further from the truth.

From 2015-2023, US investments in EV and battery manufacturing created 179,300 new jobs and could create 800,000 indirect jobs to support the growing industry. EV charging infrastructure alone could create over 150,000 jobs by 2032.

In fact, many Republican lawmakers represent states where the EV boom is spurring a manufacturing renaissance. For example, since the passage of federal incentives through the IRA, South Carolina has seen 14 EV and battery projects launched, which will create a projected 10,000 new jobs.

While many of these lawmakers rebuffed federal climate incentives, they’re happily welcoming — and taking credit for — the benefits to their local economies.

Meanwhile, some lawmakers spurning EVs are keeping jobs out of their state by opposing EV manufacturing. Glenn Youngkin, the Republican governor of Virginia, recently stopped plans for a Ford battery plant, which would have created 2,500 new jobs.

We Can’t Let Republicans Undo Progress on EVs

Transportation makes up a full third of US climate pollution. We need massive investment in public transit to address this, but electrifying our transport — along with fully transitioning off fossil fuels — plays an important role in our fight against climate change. A growing EV industry is good for the environment, for consumers, and for American manufacturing and jobs.

But many Republicans would rather lean into misinformation and shill for the oil and gas industry than serve their constituents. And we need to keep them out of office. Already, former President Trump has committed to rolling back Biden’s EV policies if he returns to the White House.

At the same time, many Republican lawmakers have made it clear EVs are one of their main targets. Already, they tried to cut Biden’s $7.5 billion investment in charging stations.

The list of reasons we need to keep them out of office is long — their rhetoric and action on EVs is yet another item.

This year, Food & Water Action is working to elect climate champions to defend our planet and our democracy.